Leveraged ETF mechanics create unstable feedback loopsRevived after 27 quiet weeks.
Then“The guest argued most investors should be hesitant to use single-stock leveraged ETFs due to their complexity, high costs, and the behavioral tendency toward overconfidence.”Now“The case was made that a key risk of leveraged ETFs is that investors misunderstand the product, expecting a multiple of the long-term return rather than the daily return, leading to unexpected losses.”What finance podcasts are saying aboutSK Hynix Inc.000660.KSKorea Exchange (KOSPI) · South Korea
According to Zortix's podcast index, SK Hynix Inc. (000660.KS) was discussed on 5 finance podcasts across 5 episodes in the 30 days to 27 Aug 2026, generating 5 attributed ideas — most coverage from CNBC Fast Money, Prof G Markets and The Alpha Exchange.
- Mentions · 7d
- 1
- Mentions · 30d
- 5
- Mentions · 90d
- 44
- Episodes · 30d
- 5
- Shows · 30d
- 5
- Vs prior week
- 0
- Discussion depth
- Substantive discussion
As of 26 Aug 2026
Ask Zortix about 000660.KSKey facts
- Exchange
- Korea Exchange (KOSPI)
- Country
- South Korea
- Local symbol
- 000660
- US OTC line
- HXSCL
Listing and registration facts from public registries. Not a rating, forecast or recommendation.
Stance mix · podcast discussion
1 BULLISH · 0 BALANCED · 4 BEARISH
1 JUNWEEKLY · 90D24 AUG
Counts of attributed podcast discussion · not a rating, forecast, or recommendation
Top shows by coverage · 30 days
| Show | Ideas | Episodes |
|---|---|---|
| CNBC Fast Money | 1 | 1 |
| Prof G Markets | 1 | 1 |
| The Alpha Exchange | 1 | 1 |
| The Compound and Friends | 1 | 1 |
| The Grant Williams Podcast | 1 | 1 |
Latest ideas · headlines, attributed
24 AUG3D AGOTHE GRANT WILLIAMS PODCAST
13 AUG2W AGOCNBC FAST MONEY
3 AUG3W AGOPROF G MARKETS · FOLLOW SCOTT
Then & now on 000660.KS
What they said then, and what they are saying now.
Definitions
- Mention
- One attributed idea naming this ticker, extracted from a podcast episode and dated by the episode’s air date. How we count →
- Attributed idea
- A specific argument a named speaker made on a named show — never an aggregate opinion, never Zortix’s view. What qualifies →
- Discussion depth
- How thoroughly an idea was argued on the episode, from a brief mention to a core thesis — a description of the conversation, not a rating of the stock. The bands →
- Stance mix
- Counts of attributed ideas by the side each argued on this name — bullish, balanced, or bearish as the speaker put it. A tally of the conversation’s sides, never a combined score, a rating, or Zortix’s view.