Stripe-Advent bid to take PayPal privateRevived after 58 quiet weeks.
Then“The case made for PayPal is that it is a unique, cash-generative asset trading at a deep discount due to a persistently poor narrative, despite operational progress and share buybacks.”Now“The bear case acknowledged PayPal's cash-generating assets and high buyback yield provided a margin of safety, with a buyout being a plausible outcome.”What finance podcasts are saying aboutPayPal HoldingsPYPLNASDAQ
According to Zortix's podcast index, PayPal Holdings (PYPL) was discussed on 4 finance podcasts across 5 episodes in the 30 days to 27 Aug 2026, generating 6 attributed ideas — most coverage from We Study Billionaires - The Investors Podcast Network, Monetary Matters with Jack Farley and Motley Fool Money.
- Mentions · 7d
- 0
- Mentions · 30d
- 6
- Mentions · 90d
- 17
- Episodes · 30d
- 5
- Shows · 30d
- 4
- Vs prior week
- 0
- Discussion depth
- In-depth coverage
As of 13 Aug 2026
Ask Zortix about PYPLKey facts
- Exchange
- NASDAQ
- Sector
- Fintech & payments
- Industry
- Services-Business Services, NEC
- Headquarters
- San Jose, CA
- Fiscal year ends
- 31 December
Listing and registration facts from public registries · SEC EDGAR filings for PYPL. Not a rating, forecast or recommendation.
Stance mix · podcast discussion
1 BULLISH · 3 BALANCED · 2 BEARISH
29 JUNWEEKLY · 90D10 AUG
Counts of attributed podcast discussion · not a rating, forecast, or recommendation
Top shows by coverage · 30 days
| Show | Ideas | Episodes |
|---|---|---|
| We Study Billionaires - The Investors Podcast Network | 3 | 2 |
| Monetary Matters with Jack Farley | 1 | 1 |
| Motley Fool Money | 1 | 1 |
| WSJ What's News | 1 | 1 |
Latest ideas · headlines, attributed
13 AUG2W AGOWE STUDY BILLIONAIRES - THE INVESTORS PODCAST NETWORK
13 AUG2W AGOWE STUDY BILLIONAIRES - THE INVESTORS PODCAST NETWORK
7 AUG3W AGOMONETARY MATTERS WITH JACK FARLEY · DEIYA
Then & now on PYPL
What they said then, and what they are saying now.
Definitions
- Mention
- One attributed idea naming this ticker, extracted from a podcast episode and dated by the episode’s air date. How we count →
- Attributed idea
- A specific argument a named speaker made on a named show — never an aggregate opinion, never Zortix’s view. What qualifies →
- Discussion depth
- How thoroughly an idea was argued on the episode, from a brief mention to a core thesis — a description of the conversation, not a rating of the stock. The bands →
- Stance mix
- Counts of attributed ideas by the side each argued on this name — bullish, balanced, or bearish as the speaker put it. A tally of the conversation’s sides, never a combined score, a rating, or Zortix’s view.