Uranium spot price convergence upside thesisRevived after 56 quiet weeks.
Then“The bull case argued uranium is on the cusp of a major move, with the catalyst being the start of term-market contracting after a long hiatus.”Now“The observation was that uranium and mining names are starting to participate in broader commodity flows, with dips being bought, suggesting a potential new bull trend.”What finance podcasts are saying aboutGlobal X Uranium ETFURAExchange-traded fund
According to Zortix's podcast index, Global X Uranium ETF (URA) was discussed on 1 finance podcast across 2 episodes in the 30 days to 27 Aug 2026, generating 2 attributed ideas — most coverage from MacroVoices.
- Mentions · 7d
- 0
- Mentions · 30d
- 2
- Mentions · 90d
- 2
- Episodes · 30d
- 2
- Shows · 30d
- 1
- Vs prior week
- -1
- Discussion depth
- Substantive discussion
As of 20 Aug 2026
Ask Zortix about URATop shows by coverage · 30 days
| Show | Ideas | Episodes |
|---|---|---|
| MacroVoices | 2 | 2 |
Latest ideas · headlines, attributed
20 AUG1W AGOMACROVOICES
13 AUG2W AGOMACROVOICES
13 NOV13 NOV 2025MACROVOICES
Then & now on URA
What they said then, and what they are saying now.
Definitions
- Mention
- One attributed idea naming this ticker, extracted from a podcast episode and dated by the episode’s air date. How we count →
- Attributed idea
- A specific argument a named speaker made on a named show — never an aggregate opinion, never Zortix’s view. What qualifies →
- Discussion depth
- How thoroughly an idea was argued on the episode, from a brief mention to a core thesis — a description of the conversation, not a rating of the stock. The bands →
- Stance mix
- Counts of attributed ideas by the side each argued on this name — bullish, balanced, or bearish as the speaker put it. A tally of the conversation’s sides, never a combined score, a rating, or Zortix’s view.